Em Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:15:28PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:36:55 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>
> > [acme@jouet linux]$ cat tools/include/linux/time64.h
> > #ifndef _TOOLS_LINUX_TIME64_H
> > #define _TOOLS_LINUX_TIME64_H
> >
> > #define MSEC_PER_SEC
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:36:55 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> [acme@jouet linux]$ cat tools/include/linux/time64.h
> #ifndef _TOOLS_LINUX_TIME64_H
> #define _TOOLS_LINUX_TIME64_H
>
> #define MSEC_PER_SEC 1000L
> #define USEC_PER_MSEC 1000L
> #define NSEC_PER_USEC 1000L
> #define NSEC_PE
Em Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:19:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:20:04 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> > Em Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:40:15PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> > >
> > > Instead of using 100, define a
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:20:04 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:40:15PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
> > Instead of using 100, define a USECS_PER_SEC macro and use that
> > instead.
>
> Applying, but the kernel u
Em Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:40:15PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> Instead of using 100, define a USECS_PER_SEC macro and use that instead.
Applying, but the kernel uses USEC_PER_SEC, NSEC_PER_SEC, etc, at some
point I'll try and get those same headers
5 matches
Mail list logo
