On 2015/07/28 4:44, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/21/2015 05:44 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>> On 2015/07/21 1:36, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 07/16/2015 05:58 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
On 2015/07/15 4:29, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/13/2015 09:16 PM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>> On 2015/07/
On 07/21/2015 05:44 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 2015/07/21 1:36, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 07/16/2015 05:58 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>>> On 2015/07/15 4:29, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 07/13/2015 09:16 PM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> On 2015/07/11 9:12, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>
Hi Peter,
On 2015/07/21 1:36, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 05:58 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>> On 2015/07/15 4:29, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 07/13/2015 09:16 PM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
On 2015/07/11 9:12, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 01:32 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>>
Hi Taichi,
On 07/16/2015 05:58 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> On 2015/07/15 4:29, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 07/13/2015 09:16 PM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>>> On 2015/07/11 9:12, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 07/09/2015 01:32 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> On 2015/07/08 23:00, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
Hi Peter,
On 2015/07/15 4:29, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/13/2015 09:16 PM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>> On 2015/07/11 9:12, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 07/09/2015 01:32 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
On 2015/07/08 23:00, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 07/08/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>
Hi Taichi,
On 07/13/2015 09:16 PM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> On 2015/07/11 9:12, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 07/09/2015 01:32 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>>> On 2015/07/08 23:00, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 07/08/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/08/2015 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote
On 2015/07/11 9:12, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 01:32 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>> On 2015/07/08 23:00, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 07/08/2015 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 07/08/2015 07:55 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 06/
On 07/09/2015 01:32 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> On 2015/07/08 23:00, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> On 07/08/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2015 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 07/08/2015 07:55 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 06:03 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>>
Hi Peter and Prarit,
On 2015/07/08 23:00, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 07/08/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Hi Prarit,
>>
>> On 07/08/2015 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/08/2015 07:55 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
Hi Taichi,
On 06/05/2015 06:03 AM, Taichi Kag
On 07/08/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Prarit,
>
> On 07/08/2015 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/08/2015 07:55 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> Hi Taichi,
>>>
>>> On 06/05/2015 06:03 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
This patch provides a new parameter as a workaround of the f
Hi Prarit,
On 07/08/2015 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 07/08/2015 07:55 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Hi Taichi,
>>
>> On 06/05/2015 06:03 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>>> This patch provides a new parameter as a workaround of the following
>>> problem. It allows us to skip autoconfig_irq
On 07/08/2015 07:55 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Taichi,
>
> On 06/05/2015 06:03 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
>> This patch provides a new parameter as a workaround of the following
>> problem. It allows us to skip autoconfig_irq() and to use a well-known irq
>> number for a console even if CONFIG
Hi Taichi,
On 06/05/2015 06:03 AM, Taichi Kageyama wrote:
> This patch provides a new parameter as a workaround of the following
> problem. It allows us to skip autoconfig_irq() and to use a well-known irq
> number for a console even if CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ is defined.
>
> There're cases
13 matches
Mail list logo