Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: add input supply names

2013-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/20/2013 10:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:42:26AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/20/2013 10:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:07:17AM -0600, Stephen Warren >>> wrote: On 03/20/2013 06:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > I generally s

Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: add input supply names

2013-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/20/2013 10:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:07:17AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/20/2013 06:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >>> I generally send a patches on single git-send command git >>> send-emal --to=ldewan...@nvidia.com .patch 0001.patch > >> Don't do

Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: add input supply names

2013-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/20/2013 06:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Wednesday 20 March 2013 06:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> * PGP Signed by an unknown key >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:59:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> >> There's something odd about several recent patch serieses you've posted, >> they end

Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: add input supply names

2013-03-20 Thread Laxman Dewangan
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 06:55 PM, Mark Brown wrote: * PGP Signed by an unknown key On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:24:54PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: The regulator core register the regulator even if there is NULL init_data and in this case, it tries to findout the input-supply (provided thro

Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: add input supply names

2013-03-20 Thread Laxman Dewangan
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 06:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: * PGP Signed by an unknown key On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:59:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: There's something odd about several recent patch serieses you've posted, they end up with patch 2 before instead of after patch 1. Anyway...