Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:11:05 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote:
> Hi Namhyung,
>
I'm thinking about something like below.. but sadly it doesn't work for
me.. hmm.
>>>
>>> Actually this appears to work for me (with 2.6.9 & 2.7.6) and I
>>> find this solution more
>>> elegant.
>>
>>
Hi Namhyung,
>>> I'm thinking about something like below.. but sadly it doesn't work for
>>> me.. hmm.
>>
>> Actually this appears to work for me (with 2.6.9 & 2.7.6) and I
>> find this solution more
>> elegant.
>
> Thanks for testing. It was my fault on setting symlink to a
> non-existing file
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:43:24 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote:
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> apologies for mixing up your first name earlier.
It's okay, nevermind. :)
> On 2014-07-25 12:24, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:55 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote:
>>> ifndef NO_LIBPYTHON
>>> -
Hi Namhyung,
apologies for mixing up your first name earlier.
On 2014-07-25 12:24, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:55 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote:
>> Hi Kim,
>>
>> On 2014-07-25 05:14, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portab
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:55 +0200, Thomas Ilsche wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> On 2014-07-25 05:14, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use
>> python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2.
>
> I tried to find out how backwar
Hi Kim,
On 2014-07-25 05:14, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> According to PEP 394 recommendation [1], it's more portable to use
> python2 rather than plain python to refer python binary version 2.
I tried to find out how backwards-compatible this is. python2(-config)
was first available in Python 2.7.3 (Ap
6 matches
Mail list logo
