On 06/17/2013 03:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
From: David Daney
We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a defini
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
>> From: David Daney
>>
>> We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
>> asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
>> raw_smp_processor_id().
>
> Th
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:07 AM, David Howells wrote:
> ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> -#include
>> +/* linux/smp.h <- linux/irqflags.h needs asm/smp.h first */
>> +#include
>> #endif
>
> If you make this change, is the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ still necessary, I
> wond
ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> -#include
> +/* linux/smp.h <- linux/irqflags.h needs asm/smp.h first */
> +#include
> #endif
If you make this change, is the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ still necessary, I
wonder...
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
> asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
> raw_smp_processor_id().
Thanks, this fixes the build!
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
Acked-by:
5 matches
Mail list logo