On 12.11.2013 22:55, Joe Mario wrote:
> Given there are 5 other locations in the code that need to be changed
> from [128] to [KSYM_NAME_LEN], and that we still haven't found Fengguang's
> problem yet, I'd be in favor of letting Michal's revert patch 2/2 go
> forward.
It's in kbuild.git#kbu
On 11/11/2013 09:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
This reverts commits
f3462aa (Kbuild: Handle longer symbols in kallsyms.c) and
eea0e9c (kbuild: Increase kallsyms max symbol length)
except for the added overflow check. The reason is a regres
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:17:15AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > This reverts commits
> > f3462aa (Kbuild: Handle longer symbols in kallsyms.c) and
> > eea0e9c (kbuild: Increase kallsyms max symbol length)
> > except for the added overf
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> This reverts commits
> f3462aa (Kbuild: Handle longer symbols in kallsyms.c) and
> eea0e9c (kbuild: Increase kallsyms max symbol length)
> except for the added overflow check. The reason is a regression caused
> by increasing the buffe
4 matches
Mail list logo
