Well yeah, in your particular case you're allocating from a heavily
over-contended address space, so much of the time it is genuinely full.
Plus you're primarily churning one or two sizes of IOVA, so there's a
high chance that you will either allocate immediately from the cached
node (after a
On 2021-03-18 11:38, John Garry wrote:
On 10/03/2021 17:47, John Garry wrote:
On 09/03/2021 15:55, John Garry wrote:
On 05/03/2021 16:35, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Robin,
When restarting after searching below the cached node fails, resetting
the start point to the anchor node is often overly pe
On 10/03/2021 17:47, John Garry wrote:
On 09/03/2021 15:55, John Garry wrote:
On 05/03/2021 16:35, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Robin,
When restarting after searching below the cached node fails, resetting
the start point to the anchor node is often overly pessimistic. If
allocations are made with
On 05/03/2021 16:35, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Robin,
When restarting after searching below the cached node fails, resetting
the start point to the anchor node is often overly pessimistic. If
allocations are made with mixed limits - particularly in the case of the
opportunistic 32-bit allocation f
4 matches
Mail list logo
