Shawn,
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> This should be possible to verify in one of two ways. If the TRM has
>> a typo and things truly _do_ start at 0 instead of 1, then:
>>
>> 1. There will be roughly mirrors of valid ranges.
>> 2. Things won't match up if we change tuning
在 2016/5/13 12:36, Doug Anderson 写道:
Shawn,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
在 2016/5/13 7:10, Brian Norris 写道:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:03:17AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
Just like every other Rockhip device, the MMC "_sample" clocks should
have a shift of 0, not a shi
Shawn,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> 在 2016/5/13 7:10, Brian Norris 写道:
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:03:17AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> Just like every other Rockhip device, the MMC "_sample" clocks should
>>> have a shift of 0, not a shift of 1. The rk3399 TRM
在 2016/5/13 7:10, Brian Norris 写道:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:03:17AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
Just like every other Rockhip device, the MMC "_sample" clocks should
have a shift of 0, not a shift of 1. The rk3399 TRM agrees. Presumably
these values were set to 0 because of a typo.
I'll se
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:03:17AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Just like every other Rockhip device, the MMC "_sample" clocks should
> have a shift of 0, not a shift of 1. The rk3399 TRM agrees. Presumably
> these values were set to 0 because of a typo.
I'll semi-disagree about the TRM: the TR
5 matches
Mail list logo