On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:49:49PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hm, some of these users (e.g. drivers/usb/core/*) do call
> of_node_put() properly at releasing, but some look leaking to me.
> I don't think we have the common code in the driver core to release
> dev->of_node, at least.
> If any, t
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:41:14 +0200,
Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai writes:
>
> >> Special review query: review the "return of_node_get(node)", which
> >> assumes that upon device removal, of_put_node(dev.of_node) will be
> >> called...
> >
> > Is it really done automagically? I couldn't
Takashi Iwai writes:
>> Special review query: review the "return of_node_get(node)", which
>> assumes that upon device removal, of_put_node(dev.of_node) will be
>> called...
>
> Is it really done automagically? I couldn't spot it.
Neither could I ...
I based this on device_set_of_node_from_dev(
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:43:56 +0200,
Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Add a devicetree binding for codecs. This is especially useful if the
> AC97 bitclk clock is provided by the codec, as it has to be described in
> the devicetree description for the ac97 bus code to aquire it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert
4 matches
Mail list logo
