Re: [PATCH 18/19] crypto: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

2016-04-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Will do. Do you prefer it now as a stand along patch or when I repost > the full series. This one doesn't depend on any previous so I can do > both ways. I think a standalone patch is fine. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page:

Re: [PATCH 18/19] crypto: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

2016-04-14 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 14-04-16 14:27:31, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced > > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. > > > > lzo_init us

Re: [PATCH 18/19] crypto: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

2016-04-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. > > lzo_init uses __GFP_REPEAT to allocate LZO1X_MEM_COMPRESS 16K. This i