* Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb, at 11:50:35AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Hm, so the GUIDs are line-broken in the same fashion in the spec, after the
> > third
> > parameter?
>
> Yep, they are.
>
> > That's a strong reason indeed - and then the changelog and title should say
> > t
On Wed, 03 Feb, at 11:50:35AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Hm, so the GUIDs are line-broken in the same fashion in the spec, after the
> third
> parameter?
Yep, they are.
> That's a strong reason indeed - and then the changelog and title should say
> that:
> 're-format GUID tables to follow the
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 11:33 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > From: Peter Jones
> >
> > This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if
> > you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain about
> > it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter
* Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb, at 11:33:35AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Matt Fleming wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peter Jones
> > >
> > > This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if
> > > you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain abou
On Wed, 03 Feb, at 11:33:35AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > From: Peter Jones
> >
> > This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if
> > you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain about
> > it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter J
* Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Peter Jones
>
> This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if
> you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain about
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming
> ---
> in
6 matches
Mail list logo
