Re: [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support

2013-10-03 Thread boris brezillon
On 03/10/2013 19:55, boris brezillon wrote: Hi Guenter, On 03/10/2013 19:31, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:19:18PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: The at91sam9 watchdog timer can only be configured once, and the current implementation tries to configure it in a static way: - 2

Re: [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support

2013-10-03 Thread boris brezillon
Hi Guenter, On 03/10/2013 19:31, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:19:18PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: The at91sam9 watchdog timer can only be configured once, and the current implementation tries to configure it in a static way: - 2 seconds timeout - wdt restart every 500ms If

Re: [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support

2013-10-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:19:18PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > The at91sam9 watchdog timer can only be configured once, and the current > implementation tries to configure it in a static way: > - 2 seconds timeout > - wdt restart every 500ms > > If the timer has already been configured with di