Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: Allow OF to be enabled if COMPILE_TEST to increase coverage

Hi Rob, > On Apr 23, 2015, at 21:22 , Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 16:13 , Rob Herring wrote: >>> >>> +Pantelis >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>> wrote: Currently t

Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: Allow OF to be enabled if COMPILE_TEST to increase coverage

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Rob, > >> On Apr 6, 2015, at 16:13 , Rob Herring wrote: >> >> +Pantelis >> >> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> wrote: >>> Currently the OF configuration symbol is explicitly selected on >>> architectures that su

Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: Allow OF to be enabled if COMPILE_TEST to increase coverage

Hi Rob, > On Apr 6, 2015, at 16:13 , Rob Herring wrote: > > +Pantelis > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> Currently the OF configuration symbol is explicitly selected on >> architectures that support device trees and/or Open Firmware. >> However, there's no tech

Re: [PATCH 1/3] of: Allow OF to be enabled if COMPILE_TEST to increase coverage

+Pantelis On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Currently the OF configuration symbol is explicitly selected on > architectures that support device trees and/or Open Firmware. > However, there's no technical reason to limit the device tree > infrastructure to these architect