Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 03:42:49 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, August 02, 2014 03:31:01 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, August 01, 2014 04:29:40 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, August 01, 2014 03:43:21 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Raf

Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, August 02, 2014 03:31:01 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 01, 2014 04:29:40 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, August 01, 2014 03:43:21 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > OK, I guess "IRQ_HANDLED from a wakeup int

Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, August 01, 2014 04:29:40 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 01, 2014 03:43:21 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > OK, I guess "IRQ_HANDLED from a wakeup interrupt" may be interpreted as > > > IRQ_HANDLED_PMWAKE. On the other hand

Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, August 01, 2014 03:43:21 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > OK, I guess "IRQ_HANDLED from a wakeup interrupt" may be interpreted as > > IRQ_HANDLED_PMWAKE. On the other hand, if that's going to be handled in > > handle_irq_event_percpu(), then u

Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > OK, I guess "IRQ_HANDLED from a wakeup interrupt" may be interpreted as > IRQ_HANDLED_PMWAKE. On the other hand, if that's going to be handled in > handle_irq_event_percpu(), then using a special return code would save us > a brach for IRQ_HANDLED int

Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, August 01, 2014 11:40:55 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, August 01, 2014 12:16:23 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: [cut] > > > > And now there's one more piece of it which is suspend-to-idle (aka > > > > "freeze"). > > > > That doesn't

Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn

2014-08-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 01, 2014 12:16:23 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Right, so instead of thinking about a proper solution driver folks just slap > > the next available thing on it w/o thinking about the consequences. But, > > thats partly our own fault d