Re: [PATCH 1/3] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use fallback if DT/ACPI enum failed

2018-07-02 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 08:53:00 +0200 Nikolaus Voss wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:10:10 +0200 > > Nikolaus Voss wrote: > > > >> Currently, the driver bails out if not explicitly referred to in > >> DT or ACPI tables. This prevents fallback mech

Re: [PATCH 1/3] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use fallback if DT/ACPI enum failed

2018-07-01 Thread Nikolaus Voss
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:10:10 +0200 Nikolaus Voss wrote: Currently, the driver bails out if not explicitly referred to in DT or ACPI tables. This prevents fallback mechanisms from coming into effect, e.g. I2C device ID table match via DT or ACPI PRP

Re: [PATCH 1/3] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use fallback if DT/ACPI enum failed

2018-06-30 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:10:10 +0200 Nikolaus Voss wrote: > Currently, the driver bails out if not explicitly referred to in > DT or ACPI tables. This prevents fallback mechanisms from coming > into effect, e.g. I2C device ID table match via DT or ACPI > PRP0001 HID. However DT/ACPI enum should tak