Milosz Tanski wrote:
> + * since we might be called recusively via parent fs.
I've changed that to "recursively".
> +bool relase_page_wait_timeout(struct fscache_cookie *cookie, struct page
> *page)
I've changed that to "release_page_wait_timeout()".
> + if (!relase_page_wait_timeout(coo
Originally I was planning doing something with that (a debug message)
but I decided against it and forgot to remove it.
Neil Brown came up with a very similar solution that he posted as I
was developing my own. His patch might be a better candidate.
- M
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32 AM, David Ho
Milosz Tanski wrote:
> +bool relase_page_wait_timeout(struct fscache_cookie *cookie, struct page
> *page
I presume you mean "release_page_wait_timeout".
Also, the new function returns a value which you then ignore. Should you do
something with it?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
3 matches
Mail list logo