On Friday 15 April 2016 09:47 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 05:24 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>
>>
>> This made me notice that num-cs is populated wrongly for spi1. It
>> actually has 8 chip selects. This is fine though.
>
> I might as well fix it since I have to make changes anyway. Don't
On 04/15/2016 03:16 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:17:55 -0500, David Lechner said:
I omitted this on purpose. For my use case, I am using the SPI as
write-only,
So your SPI accesses are fire-and-forget, and nothing ever comes back?
Yes.
Seems a very dangerous w
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:17:55 -0500, David Lechner said:
> I omitted this on purpose. For my use case, I am using the SPI as
> write-only,
So your SPI accesses are fire-and-forget, and nothing ever comes back?
Seems a very dangerous way to design the use case, with no feedback if
something suddenl
On 04/15/2016 05:24 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
This made me notice that num-cs is populated wrongly for spi1. It
actually has 8 chip selects. This is fine though.
I might as well fix it since I have to make changes anyway. Don't
remember how I came up with 6.
Also, it will be nice to add pin
On Thursday 14 April 2016 04:00 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> Adds device definition for soc spi0 and also a aux data that is needed
> for clock matching.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 10 ++
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da8xx-dt.c | 1 +
> 2 files
5 matches
Mail list logo