On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:21:06 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This also needs to be marked for stable. I'll start looking at how far
> this goes back. I'm thinking it may go back as far as the splice code
> was created.
Actually, it is broken back to 3.16. 3.15 and before was safe because
it was st
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:26:06 +0100
Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On a !PREEMPT kernel, attempting to use trace-cmd results in a soft
> lockup:
>
> # trace-cmd record -e raw_syscalls:* -F false
> NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trace-cmd:61]
> ...
> Call Trace:
> [] ? __wake
2 matches
Mail list logo
