Hi Anton,
vio_bus_probe now calls vio_cmo_bus_probe before calling probe.
This results in calling get_desired_dma to get rtce buf size
before we have called probe which initializes vtpm driver and
sets up the tpm data, i.e. rtce buf size.
ibmvtpm_get_data returns NULL in get_desired_dma is a s
Hi,
> is this patchset still needed after Vicky's patch
> "[tpmdd-devel] Fix NULL return in tpm_ibmvtpm_get_desired_dma"
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/402315/
>
> Ashley raised some concerns.
>
> Since merge window is coming up, a fast reply is appreciated.
We definitely need a way to c
Hi Anton,
is this patchset still needed after Vicky's patch
"[tpmdd-devel] Fix NULL return in tpm_ibmvtpm_get_desired_dma"
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/402315/
Ashley raised some concerns.
Since merge window is coming up, a fast reply is appreciated.
Thanks,
Peter
Am Freitag, 19. Septe
I recommend not applying this patch until we hear back from IBM.
Thanks,
--Ashley
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Peter Hüwe wrote:
Hi,
so shall I apply this patch? or not?
Thanks,
Peter
Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014, 20:22:35 schrieb Ashley Lai:
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vi
Hi,
so shall I apply this patch? or not?
Thanks,
Peter
Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014, 20:22:35 schrieb Ashley Lai:
> > @@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64
> > w1, u64 w2) static struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm_get_data(const struct
> > device *dev) {
> >
> >
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1, u64
w2)
static struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm_get_data(const struct device *dev)
{
struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- if (chip)
- return (struct ibmvtpm_dev *)TPM_VPRIV(chip);
-
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Anton Blanchard wrote:
I'm looking at an oops in tpm_ibmvtpm_get_desired_dma:
28:00 00 20 39 li r9,0
2c:10 00 01 e8 ld r0,16(r1)
30:28 00 69 80 lwz r3,40(r9)
We set r9 to 0 then load r9+40. The problem is actually in
ibmvtpm_get_d
Hi Anton,
Thanks for the patch. Is this oops easy to recreate? If so could
you give us the steps to reproduce?
Thanks,
--Ashley Lai
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Anton Blanchard wrote:
I'm looking at an oops in tpm_ibmvtpm_get_desired_dma:
28:00 00 20 39 li r9,0
2c:10 00 01 e8
8 matches
Mail list logo