Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools build: Introduce features dump include makefile

2015-12-07 Thread Wangnan (F)
On 2015/12/7 18:32, Wangnan (F) wrote: On 2015/12/7 18:29, Jiri Olsa wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:22:41PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: Sorry for the late response... Tested-by: Wang Nan But I'm thinking whether we can remove FEATURE-DUMP and rely on FEATURE-INCLUDE only, since they con

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools build: Introduce features dump include makefile

2015-12-07 Thread Wangnan (F)
On 2015/12/7 18:29, Jiri Olsa wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:22:41PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: Sorry for the late response... Tested-by: Wang Nan But I'm thinking whether we can remove FEATURE-DUMP and rely on FEATURE-INCLUDE only, since they contain same information... had the same tho

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools build: Introduce features dump include makefile

2015-12-07 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:22:41PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > Sorry for the late response... > > Tested-by: Wang Nan > > But I'm thinking whether we can remove FEATURE-DUMP and rely on > FEATURE-INCLUDE only, since they contain same information... had the same thought, but the issue I hit is t

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools build: Introduce features dump include makefile

2015-12-07 Thread Wangnan (F)
Sorry for the late response... Tested-by: Wang Nan But I'm thinking whether we can remove FEATURE-DUMP and rely on FEATURE-INCLUDE only, since they contain same information... Thank you. On 2015/12/7 16:56, Jiri Olsa wrote: ping, Wang Nan, any comments on these 2? thanks, jirka On Fri, Nov

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools build: Introduce features dump include makefile

2015-12-07 Thread Jiri Olsa
ping, Wang Nan, any comments on these 2? thanks, jirka On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:06:50AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > Creating the FEATURE-INCLUDE file, that contains all features > status dumped in make's variable format: >... >feature-backtrace=1 >feature-dwarf=1 >... > > It's pu