Em Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:07:23PM +, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:a...@kernel.org]
> >Em Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:19:24PM +, Wang Nan escreveu:
> >> In system with kprobe enabled but uprobe turned off, 'perf probe -d'
> >> causes segfault because
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:a...@kernel.org]
>Em Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:19:24PM +, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> In system with kprobe enabled but uprobe turned off, 'perf probe -d'
>> causes segfault because it calls probe_file__get_events() with a
>> negative fd (when deleting uprobe even
Em Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:19:24PM +, Wang Nan escreveu:
> In system with kprobe enabled but uprobe turned off, 'perf probe -d'
> causes segfault because it calls probe_file__get_events() with a
> negative fd (when deleting uprobe events).
>
> This patch validates fds before calling probe_file
From: Wang Nan [mailto:wangn...@huawei.com]
>
>In system with kprobe enabled but uprobe turned off, 'perf probe -d'
>causes segfault because it calls probe_file__get_events() with a
>negative fd (when deleting uprobe events).
Hmm, OK. This may happen if user runs perf probe on the kernel
which onl
4 matches
Mail list logo