On Sunday 07/12 at 23:52 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:24:55PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> > need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> > other. This patch adds th
On Monday 07/13 at 11:05 -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 07/12/2015 12:24 AM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> > need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> > other. This patch adds the refcount, and refacto
On Thursday 07/16 at 20:27 +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> > need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> > other. This patch adds the refcou
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> other. This patch adds the refcount, and refactors the code to use it.
>
> Additionally, we cannot
On 07/12/2015 12:24 AM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> other. This patch adds the refcount, and refactors the code to use it.
>
> Additionally, we cannot iterate
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:24:55PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> These objects can be referenced concurrently throughout the driver, we
> need a way to make sure threads can't delete them out from under each
> other. This patch adds the refcount, and refactors the code to use it.
>
> Additionally,
6 matches
Mail list logo