On 10/02/19 09:20, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 16:11 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > On 09/19/19 16:37, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:32, Vincent Guittot
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 09/
[+ Steven Rostedt ]
On 29/08/2019 05:15, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> At original linux design, RT & CFS scheduler are independent.
> Current RT task placement policy will select the first cpu in
> lowest_mask, even if the first CPU is running a CFS task.
> This may put RT task to a running cpu and let C
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 16:11 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 09/19/19 16:37, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:32, Vincent Guittot
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 09/19/19 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > > > > > But
On 09/19/19 16:37, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:32, Vincent Guittot
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > >
> > > On 09/19/19 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > > > > But for requirement of performance, I think it is better to
> > > > > >
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:32, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Qais Yousef wrote:
> >
> > On 09/19/19 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > > > But for requirement of performance, I think it is better to
> > > > > > differentiate between idle CPU and CPU has CFS task.
> >
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 16:23, Qais Yousef wrote:
>
> On 09/19/19 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > > But for requirement of performance, I think it is better to
> > > > > differentiate between idle CPU and CPU has CFS task.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, we use rt-app to evaluate runnable t
On 09/19/19 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > But for requirement of performance, I think it is better to
> > > > differentiate between idle CPU and CPU has CFS task.
> > > >
> > > > For example, we use rt-app to evaluate runnable time on non-patched
> > > > environment.
> > > > There are (NR
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 13:22, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:01 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Hi Jing-Ting,
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 15:26, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 15:55 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > > On 08/29/19 11:38, Valentin Schneide
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:01 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Jing-Ting,
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 15:26, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 15:55 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > On 08/29/19 11:38, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > > > On 29/08/2019 04:15, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> > > >
Hi Jing-Ting,
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 15:26, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 15:55 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > On 08/29/19 11:38, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > > On 29/08/2019 04:15, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> > > > At original linux design, RT & CFS scheduler are independent.
> > > > Cu
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 15:55 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 08/29/19 11:38, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > On 29/08/2019 04:15, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> > > At original linux design, RT & CFS scheduler are independent.
> > > Current RT task placement policy will select the first cpu in
> > > lowest_mask
On 08/29/19 11:38, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 29/08/2019 04:15, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> > At original linux design, RT & CFS scheduler are independent.
> > Current RT task placement policy will select the first cpu in
> > lowest_mask, even if the first CPU is running a CFS task.
> > This may put
On 29/08/2019 04:15, Jing-Ting Wu wrote:
> At original linux design, RT & CFS scheduler are independent.
> Current RT task placement policy will select the first cpu in
> lowest_mask, even if the first CPU is running a CFS task.
> This may put RT task to a running cpu and let CFS task runnable.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo