On 06/11/2015 02:52 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 13:21 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Wonder if I should step in as interim maintainer to handle urgent
requests like this one. Comments, thoughts, anyone ?
This is about a pretty major build issue, that's been known for ten
months no
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 13:21 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Wonder if I should step in as interim maintainer to handle urgent
> requests like this one. Comments, thoughts, anyone ?
This is about a pretty major build issue, that's been known for ten
months now, isn't? If that's correct, this is not a
On 05/13/2015 06:41 AM, Jonas Bonn wrote:
On 05/13/2015 03:33 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Just remembered ... or just apply https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/11 instead.
(That patch also suggests that "or12" in the patch we're discussing here
is
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 03:41:42PM +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 03:33 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> >On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>Just remembered ... or just apply https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/11
> >>instead.
> >(That patch also suggests that "or12" in the p
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:44:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> >> openrisc.net is no more long story, not worth regurgitating.
> >
> > I see. What would you suggest as substitut
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>> openrisc.net is no more long story, not worth regurgitating.
>
> I see. What would you suggest as substitutes for:
> MAINTAINERS:W:http://openrisc.net
> MAINTAINERS:L:li
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> openrisc.net is no more long story, not worth regurgitating.
I see. What would you suggest as substitutes for:
MAINTAINERS:W:http://openrisc.net
MAINTAINERS:L:li...@lists.openrisc.net (moderated for non-subscribers)
MAI
On 05/13/2015 03:33 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Just remembered ... or just apply https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/11 instead.
(That patch also suggests that "or12" in the patch we're discussing here
is a typo.)
This is problem is present now fo
On 05/13/2015 06:33 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Just remembered ... or just apply https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/11 instead.
(That patch also suggests that "or12" in the patch we're discussing here
is a typo.)
This is problem is present now f
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Just remembered ... or just apply https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/11 instead.
(That patch also suggests that "or12" in the patch we're discussing here
is a typo.)
This is problem is present now for none months, apparently. Your patch
was s
On 05/13/2015 02:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 13:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:45:21PM +0200, anees wrote:
Kernel build fails with error "target elf32-or32 not found"
This is due to the change in OpenRISC compiler prefix from "or12"
to "or1k". Add c
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 13:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:45:21PM +0200, anees wrote:
> > Kernel build fails with error "target elf32-or32 not found"
> > This is due to the change in OpenRISC compiler prefix from "or12"
> > to "or1k". Add config options that set architect
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:45:21PM +0200, anees wrote:
> Kernel build fails with error "target elf32-or32 not found"
> This is due to the change in OpenRISC compiler prefix from "or12"
> to "or1k". Add config options that set architecture output format
> default to "or1k" but also allow user to sel
13 matches
Mail list logo
