On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:27:08PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:40:25PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >
> > The EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE limit of 1MB was also totally arbitrary,
> > but a reasonable upper limit for the atomic get/set interface used by
> > xattrs.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:40:25PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> The EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE limit of 1MB was also totally arbitrary,
> but a reasonable upper limit for the atomic get/set interface used by
> xattrs. The underlying disk format could actually store xattrs of any size.
>
>
On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 02:21:19PM -0700, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
>> EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE definition in ext4 is currently unused.
>> Besides, vfs enforces its own 64k limit which makes the 1MB limit in
>> ext4 redundant. Remove it.
>
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 02:21:19PM -0700, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE definition in ext4 is currently unused.
> Besides, vfs enforces its own 64k limit which makes the 1MB limit in
> ext4 redundant. Remove it.
Just FYI I believe the 64k VFS limit exists because XFS is the
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 02:21:19PM -0700, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE definition in ext4 is currently unused.
> Besides, vfs enforces its own 64k limit which makes the 1MB limit in
> ext4 redundant. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan
Thanks, added to the ext4 p
5 matches
Mail list logo
