Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:44:12AM +, Lee Jones wrote: > Okay, I've just re-read this thread and it appears you're both talking > about different things. > Linus is talking about a discussion with Bengt regarding how these > strange sysclkreq thingies work. When I first read the code they > a

Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-26 Thread Bengt Jönsson
On 02/26/2013 10:44 AM, Lee Jones wrote: On Tue, 05 Feb 2013, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:21:36PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: What is needed is some way to model that electronic relationship into both the regulator and clock subsystems (Ulf Hansson is working on the ABx500 cl

Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-26 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:21:36PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > What is needed is some way to model that > > electronic relationship into both the regulator > > and clock subsystems (Ulf Hansson is working on > > the ABx500 clocks as we speak.) > > >

Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-05 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:21:36PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > What is needed is some way to model that > > electronic relationship into both the regulator > > and clock subsystems (Ulf Hansson is working on > > the ABx500 clocks as we speak.) > > >

Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:21:36PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > What is needed is some way to model that > electronic relationship into both the regulator > and clock subsystems (Ulf Hansson is working on > the ABx500 clocks as we speak.) > Maybe the actual place to have it would be > somewhere

Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-04 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:53:20AM +, Lee Jones wrote: >> Vsmps3 is put in HW control by SysClkReq1 at init. The >> corresponding settings in suspend-force are removed. > > So, I've applied the patches up to here though I'm still reallly unha

Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1

2013-02-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:53:20AM +, Lee Jones wrote: > Vsmps3 is put in HW control by SysClkReq1 at init. The > corresponding settings in suspend-force are removed. So, I've applied the patches up to here though I'm still reallly unhappy with this code - it seems clear from the comments that