Re: [PATCH 05/15] net: phy: reset the PHY even if probe() is not implemented

2020-06-24 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
wt., 23 cze 2020 o 21:14 Florian Fainelli napisaƂ(a): > > On 6/22/20 2:37 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > Currently we only call phy_device_reset() if the PHY driver implements > > the probe() callback. This is not mandatory and many drivers (e.g. > > realtek)

Re: [PATCH 05/15] net: phy: reset the PHY even if probe() is not implemented

2020-06-23 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 6/22/20 2:37 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Currently we only call phy_device_reset() if the PHY driver implements > the probe() callback. This is not mandatory and many drivers (e.g. > realtek) don't need probe() for most devices but still can have reset > GPIO

Re: [PATCH 05/15] net: phy: reset the PHY even if probe() is not implemented

2020-06-22 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:37:34AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Currently we only call phy_device_reset() if the PHY driver implements > the probe() callback. This is not mandatory and many drivers (e.g. > realtek) don't need probe() for most devices but still