Re: [PATCH 05/10] VFIO: pci: Introduce direct EOI INTx interrupt handler

2017-06-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/06/17 09:07, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Alex, Marc, > > On 31/05/2017 20:24, Alex Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:18 +0200 >> Eric Auger wrote: >> >>> We add two new fields in vfio_pci_irq_ctx struct: deoi and handler. >>> If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to t

Re: [PATCH 05/10] VFIO: pci: Introduce direct EOI INTx interrupt handler

2017-06-14 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Alex, Marc, On 31/05/2017 20:24, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:18 +0200 > Eric Auger wrote: > >> We add two new fields in vfio_pci_irq_ctx struct: deoi and handler. >> If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to the virtual >> IRQ is directly deactivated by th

Re: [PATCH 05/10] VFIO: pci: Introduce direct EOI INTx interrupt handler

2017-06-02 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 01/06/17 21:40, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 31/05/2017 20:24, Alex Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:18 +0200 >> Eric Auger wrote: >> >>> We add two new fields in vfio_pci_irq_ctx struct: deoi and handler. >>> If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to the vir

Re: [PATCH 05/10] VFIO: pci: Introduce direct EOI INTx interrupt handler

2017-06-01 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Alex, On 31/05/2017 20:24, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:18 +0200 > Eric Auger wrote: > >> We add two new fields in vfio_pci_irq_ctx struct: deoi and handler. >> If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to the virtual >> IRQ is directly deactivated by the gues

Re: [PATCH 05/10] VFIO: pci: Introduce direct EOI INTx interrupt handler

2017-05-31 Thread Alex Williamson
On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:18 +0200 Eric Auger wrote: > We add two new fields in vfio_pci_irq_ctx struct: deoi and handler. > If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to the virtual > IRQ is directly deactivated by the guest and the VFIO driver does > not need to disable the physical I