On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 13:08 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> > I would really like to make these smaller. They are made for every
> > system call, and I consider tracing to always be added overhead. I hate
> > it when we waste more memory for tracing as very few people use it
> > (compared to those that
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:53 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
>> On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> > Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events.
>> >
>> > The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable
>> > of sy
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:53 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
> On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events.
> >
> > The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable
> > of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patche
On 2013/6/21 2:31, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to syscall events.
>
> The original SOFT_DISABLE patches didn't add support for soft disable
> of syscall events; this adds it and paves the way for future patches
> allowing triggers to be added to syscall events, since triggers
4 matches
Mail list logo
