Hello,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:42:26AM -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
> To be clear: you would like a patch series that converts the users of
> the ida_* routines in my patches to instead use the ida_simple_*
> routines, correct? And of course the ida_* helper routines I was adding
> in idr.h would n
On 09/15/2015 11:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:38:42AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> For most of the SCSI stuff, yes. I'm less sure about the sd numbers.
>> They go up very high and get hammered a lot during system bring up and
>> hot plug. I think having the
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:38:42AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> For most of the SCSI stuff, yes. I'm less sure about the sd numbers.
> They go up very high and get hammered a lot during system bring up and
> hot plug. I think having their own lock rather than wrapping everything
> arou
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 14:27 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:46:01AM -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * ida_get_index - allocate a ida index value
> > + * @idaidr handle
> > + * @lock spinlock handle protecting this index
> > + * @p_id pointer
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:46:01AM -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
> +/**
> + * ida_get_index - allocate a ida index value
> + * @ida idr handle
> + * @lock spinlock handle protecting this index
> + * @p_id pointer to allocated index value
> + *
> + * A helper function for saf
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 09:46 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
> Clients of the ida and idr index-management routines
> tend to use the same calling sequences much of the time,
> so this change adds helper functions for allocating and
> releasing indexes of either flavor, i.e. with or
> without pointer manag
6 matches
Mail list logo
