Re: [PATCH 01/11] Added macro to check for AVX2 feature.

2013-03-22 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Just syntactic overhead. We should probably discuss it among ourselves first though. Tim Chen wrote: >On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:21 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> I really, really hate these macros... Not sure they are worth the >extra noise. >> > >I can do without the macro and I'll remove it

Re: [PATCH 01/11] Added macro to check for AVX2 feature.

2013-03-22 Thread Tim Chen
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:21 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I really, really hate these macros... Not sure they are worth the extra noise. > I can do without the macro and I'll remove it. Wonder the reason that such macro should be avoided? Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

Re: [PATCH 01/11] Added macro to check for AVX2 feature.

2013-03-22 Thread H. Peter Anvin
I really, really hate these macros... Not sure they are worth the extra noise. Tim Chen wrote: >Macro to facilitate checking the availability of the AVX2 feature. > >Signed-off-by: Tim Chen >--- > arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >diff --git a/arch/x86/