Re: [PATCH 00/19] converting system calls to 64-bit time_t, part 1

2015-05-07 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 10:52 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 07 May 2015 09:39:18 Paul Bolle wrote: > I realize the downsides of not posting the entire series at once > here, but it seemed better to avoid spamming everyone too much, > while I try to find out if we have agreement on the ove

Re: [PATCH 00/19] converting system calls to 64-bit time_t, part 1

2015-05-07 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 07 May 2015 09:39:18 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 09:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 18:30 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > * After all system calls are converted, we can change one architecture > > > at a time to select ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME, and mo

Re: [PATCH 00/19] converting system calls to 64-bit time_t, part 1

2015-05-07 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 09:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 18:30 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > * After all system calls are converted, we can change one architecture > > at a time to select ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME, and modify its system > > call table accordingly. In this versi

Re: [PATCH 00/19] converting system calls to 64-bit time_t, part 1

2015-05-07 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 18:30 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > * After all system calls are converted, we can change one architecture > at a time to select ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME, and modify its system > call table accordingly. In this version, I do it for ARM32, x86-32, > and x86-64 for demonstrati