Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add namespace support for syslog v2

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:58:23 -0700 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Rui Xiang writes: > > > This patchset introduces a system log namespace. > > The largest outstanding question is not answered. Can't we just fix > iptables to log somehwere better than dmesg, and would that not entirely > remove the

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add namespace support for syslog v2

Hi Eric, Thanks for your attention. On 2013/7/30 2:58, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Rui Xiang writes: > >> This patchset introduces a system log namespace. > > The largest outstanding question is not answered. Can't we just fix > iptables to log somehwere better than dmesg, and would that not

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add namespace support for syslog v2

Rui Xiang writes: > This patchset introduces a system log namespace. The largest outstanding question is not answered. Can't we just fix iptables to log somehwere better than dmesg, and would that not entirely remove the need for this work? That question needs to be answered before we proceed

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add namespace support for syslog v2

Hi Rui, On 07/29/2013 10:31 AM, Rui Xiang wrote: > This patchset introduces a system log namespace. > > It is the 2nd version. The link of the 1st version is > http://lwn.net/Articles/525728/. In that version, syslog_ > namespace was added into nsproxy and created through a new > clone flag CLO