On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 06:10:57AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Ping.
>
> Sorry, I've been at collab summit / lsf. Plus, it's a bit too late
> for for-3.10 anyway. Anyways, after glancing over it, here are my
> preliminary thoughts.
Hey,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 06:10:57AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Ping.
Sorry, I've been at collab summit / lsf. Plus, it's a bit too late
for for-3.10 anyway. Anyways, after glancing over it, here are my
preliminary thoughts. The first one looks good but I'm not sure about
dropping nr_run
Ping.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> I found the early-increasing nr_running in wq_worker_waking_up() is useless
> in many cases. it tries to avoid waking up idle workers for pending work item.
> but delay increasing nr_running does not increase waking up idle workers.
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
