Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >>> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it >>> support >>> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-07-02 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it >> support >> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other >> platform to x86 >> change

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 05:34:32 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:01:39 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn He

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 05:34:32 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:01:39 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> >> the reason why we need to change those cod

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:01:39 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it >> >> support >> >> pci root bus hotplug

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:39 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to > make it support > > pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align > other > > platform to x86 > > changes after pci root bus hotplug change is complete

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:01:39 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it > >> support > >> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other > >> platform

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it >> support >> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other >> platform to x86 >> changes after pci root bus hotplug change is completely done.

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> I don't know, that could be separated patcheset after we conclude >>> pci root bus hotplug support. >> >> The main reason I review patches before merging them is to identify >> issues tha

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> I don't know, that could be separated patcheset after we conclude >> pci root bus hotplug support. > > The main reason I review patches before merging them is to identify > issues that we can fix before they affect everybody. It makes my lif

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> I'm really sorry that it's taken me so long to get to these. >>> >>> I applied these to my pci/yinghai-survey-resources branch. I >>> re-ordered the last two and reworked some of the cha

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-08 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> I'm really sorry that it's taken me so long to get to these. >> >> I applied these to my pci/yinghai-survey-resources branch. I >> re-ordered the last two and reworked some of the changelogs. > > To be clear about this, the pci/yinghai-surve

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-08 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc David, Michal, Koichi, Ben, Paul] > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>> For root bus hot add, fw could assign some resource for the devices for >>> that root bus

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2013-01-07 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc David, Michal, Koichi, Ben, Paul] On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> For root bus hot add, fw could assign some resource for the devices for >> that root bus before notifying os via acpi, we should check and use those >>

Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus

2012-12-06 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > For root bus hot add, fw could assign some resource for the devices for > that root bus before notifying os via acpi, we should check and use those > resources at first just like we do for booting path. > > At first, we need to refactor x86 pci p