Re: [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters)

On 11/29/06, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2) I wedged the kernel on the container_lock, doing a removal of a cpuset using notify_on_release. I couldn't reproduce this, with a /sbin/cpuset_release_agent that does: #!/bin/bash logger cpuset_release_agent $1 rmdir /dev/cpuset/$1 a

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters)

On 11/29/06, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: config PROC_PID_CPUSET bool "Include legacy /proc//cpuset file" depends on CPUSETS + default y if CPUSETS Sounds very reasonable. 2) I wedged the kernel on the container_lock, doing a removal of a cpuset using not

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters)

I got a chance to build and test this patch set, to see if it behaved like I expected cpusets to behave, on an ia64 SN2 Altix system. Two details - otherwise looked good. I continue to like this approach. The two details are (1) /proc//cpuset not configured by default if CPUSETS configured, and