On 6/22/20 3:26 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On ma, 22 jun 2020 14:54:15 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 6/22/20 2:43 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>>> I get RX-0: FIFO overflows in listen-only mode (back-to-back burst of
>>> the single other node).
>>
>> Single other node? Who's ACKing the CAN fr
On ma, 22 jun 2020 14:54:15 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/22/20 2:43 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > I get RX-0: FIFO overflows in listen-only mode (back-to-back burst of
> > the single other node).
>
> Single other node? Who's ACKing the CAN frames?
hence the back-to-back burst.
>
> > T
On 6/22/20 2:43 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> I get RX-0: FIFO overflows in listen-only mode (back-to-back burst of
> the single other node).
Single other node? Who's ACKing the CAN frames?
> The SPI peripheral does not use DMA :-(.
The SPI messages are quite small, so DMA wont help either. Gettin
Marc,
I get RX-0: FIFO overflows in listen-only mode (back-to-back burst of
the single other node).
The SPI peripheral does not use DMA :-(.
Do you have, by accident, some freescale SPI fixes lying around?
It's not the biggest problem on my side, but is proves the system not
being guarded against
vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN driver
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/68.9.0
>
> On 6/22/20 12:25 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > I got my board up with a 5.7, despite device-tree problems comp
On 6/18/20 10:55 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> So how should we proceed from here? It is okay for me to work on adding some
> features and also fixing the issues you've reported so far. But I want to
> reach
> a consensus before moving forward.
>
> If you think that it makes sense to go with
On 6/18/20 2:06 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> https://github.com/marckleinebudde/linux/commits/v5.6-rpi/mcp25xxfd-20200607-41
>>
>
> Tested this version on my board with MCP2518FD and it works fine. I'm okay
> with
> moving forward with your version and would like to contribute. Please let
On 6/22/20 12:25 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> I got my board up with a 5.7, despite device-tree problems completely
> unrelated to CAN.
\o/
> It seems to work well with a fully-loaded CAN bus (cangen -g0 ...).
> So that is a real improvement.
Can I add your Tested-by?
> I will need to add the li
Hey Marc,
On do, 18 jun 2020 14:35:28 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/18/20 2:30 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > On do, 18 jun 2020 00:36:29 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 6/17/20 6:59 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> >>> I'm in the process of getting a Variscite imx8m mini SOM online, wi
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:25:33PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 0611, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> > > Controller with MCP2517FD
On 6/18/20 2:30 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On do, 18 jun 2020 00:36:29 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 6/17/20 6:59 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>>> I'm in the process of getting a Variscite imx8m mini SOM online, with
>>
>> Have your heard about the imx8m plus? It has CAN cores! We have a boar
On do, 18 jun 2020 00:36:29 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/17/20 6:59 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > I'm in the process of getting a Variscite imx8m mini SOM online, with
>
> Have your heard about the imx8m plus? It has CAN cores! We have a board in the
> office to play with. :)
>
> > MCP2
Hi,
On 0611, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> > Controller with MCP2517FD as the target controller version. This series is
> > mostly inspired (or taken) from th
Hi,
On 0611, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> > Controller with MCP2517FD as the target controller version. This series is
> > mostly inspired (or taken) from th
On 6/17/20 6:59 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> I'm in the process of getting a Variscite imx8m mini SOM online, with
Have your heard about the imx8m plus? It has CAN cores! We have a board in the
office to play with. :)
> MCP2517FD. The 4.19 kernel that comes with it, has a driver that is
You shall
On do, 11 jun 2020 18:26:19 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> > Controller with MCP2517FD as the target controller version. This series is
> > mostly inspir
On 6/11/20 10:30 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/11/20 6:26 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> I initially started looking at Martin's driver and it was not using several
>> modern CAN driver infrastructures. I then posted some cleanup patches but
>> Martin
>> was not working on the driver any mo
On 6/11/20 6:26 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> I initially started looking at Martin's driver and it was not using several
> modern CAN driver infrastructures. I then posted some cleanup patches but
> Martin
> was not working on the driver any more. Then I decided to rewrite the driver,
> that is
On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> Controller with MCP2517FD as the target controller version. This series is
> mostly inspired (or taken) from the previous iterations posted by Martin
> Sperl.
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
