On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:37:07 +0900 "Kawai, Hidehiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because other people might (reasonably) wish to omit anonymous memory,
> > or private mappings, or file-backed VMAs, or whatever.
> >
> > So maybe /proc/pid/coredump_omit_anon_shared should become
> > /pro
Hi,
Thank you for your kind comments.
I'm sorry for my late reply.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:41:30 +0900
> "Kawai, Hidehiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>This patch series is version 4 of the core dump masking feature,
>>which provides a per-process flag not to dump anonym
Hi,
Thank you for your kind comments.
I'm still discussing the answer with my senior colleagues, so please
wait a few days. I think I can reply at the beginning of next week.
Best regards,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:41:30 +0900
"Kawai, Hidehiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch series is version 4 of the core dump masking feature,
> which provides a per-process flag not to dump anonymous shared
> memory segments.
First up, please convince us that this problem cannot be solved in
4 matches
Mail list logo