On Tuesday, October 2, 2007 6:04 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:43:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > My only beef with this patch set is that it seems
> > a bit much to create a totally new function name every
> > time we want to set some kind of new attribute o
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:43:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> My only beef with this patch set is that it seems
> a bit much to create a totally new function name every
> time we want to set some kind of new attribute on some
> DMA object. Why not add a "dma_set_flags()" or similar
> that
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:09:26 -0700
>
> On Altix, DMA may be reordered between a device and host memory.
> This reordering can happen in the NUMA interconnect, and it usually
> results in correct operation and improved performance. In some
> situations it may be neces
3 matches
Mail list logo
