Re: [PATCH 0/4] More cleanups and fixes for Intel VT-d

2015-06-12 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:54:26PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > It looks like the original kdump patch set has basically now been > rewritten. Perhaps the best thing to do is for Zhenhua to resubmit an > updated and clean version rather than preserving that > churn? Here is a cleaned up version

Re: [PATCH 0/4] More cleanups and fixes for Intel VT-d

2015-06-12 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:54:26PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > It looks like the original kdump patch set has basically now been > rewritten. Perhaps the best thing to do is for Zhenhua to resubmit an > updated and clean version rather than preserving that > churn? Yeah, you are right. The his

Re: [PATCH 0/4] More cleanups and fixes for Intel VT-d

2015-06-11 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:47 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > here are a number of additional fixes for the Intel VT-d > driver and its behavior in a kdump kernel. The most > important fix is the iommu=pt case, which is broken without > these patches. It looks like the original kdump patch set has b