Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

2015-11-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 03/11/2015 10:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek >> >> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)). >> >> Paolo >> > > Thanks. > > Since you can rebas

Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

2015-11-03 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek > > Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)). > > Paolo > Thanks. Since you can rebase the queue freely, can you please also add: Reported-by

Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

2015-11-02 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)). Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo

Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

2015-10-31 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 10/30/15 16:36, Radim Krčmář wrote: > This series bases on "KVM: x86: fix RSM into 64-bit protected mode, > round 2" and reverts it in [3/3]. To avoid regressions after doing so, > [1/2] introduces a helper that is used in [2/2] to hopefully get the > same behavior. > > I'll set up test enviro