On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 18:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, well the timing of a merge is mainly up to you guys, especially as the
> subsystem is pretty raw and you're the only people who use it ;)
>
> Two things from a quick scan:
>
> a) In many places the patch does
>
> if (p)
>
Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 23:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Well I was asking. Do you guys think that this material is appropriate to
> > and safe enough for 2.6.13?
>
> I used your versions of the patches (Tom's ucm one is needed and you
> added that). I a
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 23:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well I was asking. Do you guys think that this material is appropriate to
> and safe enough for 2.6.13?
I used your versions of the patches (Tom's ucm one is needed and you
added that). I also back ported the trailing whitespace elimination
chan
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 23:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well I was asking. Do you guys think that this material is appropriate to
> and safe enough for 2.6.13?
We think so.
> What are "user CM" and "kernel CM"?
CM is the InfiniBand Communications Manager. It is (primarily)
responsible for setting u
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 23:12, David S. Miller wrote:
> Please acknowledge that you understand how inappropriate
> and problem causing your huge patch bomb was today to this
> mailing list.
>
> It is nearly 8 hours later, and vger.kernel.org is still
> trying mightily to spit out all of your patches
Please acknowledge that you understand how inappropriate
and problem causing your huge patch bomb was today to this
mailing list.
It is nearly 8 hours later, and vger.kernel.org is still
trying mightily to spit out all of your patches to the
5000+ people subscribed to linux-kernel.
There is abou
Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll tentatively consider this material to be not-for-2.6.13?
>
> Presuming that "this material" refers to the patch to add the kernel CM
> implementation, if kernel CM does not make 2.6.13, then user CM should
> not either as it is dependent on i
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 20:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This is version 2 of a patch series to get the Infiniband core up to
> > date.
>
> Well that was interesting.
>
> - All the patches had mangled headers:
>
> -- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1-16/...
> +++
NO No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
people! Condense your changes into more manageable pieces
or only submit smaller groups of changes at a time.
You people doing this are absolutely killing vger.kernel.org.
Every patch you post has to go to 5000+ subscribers, so ple
Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is version 2 of a patch series to get the Infiniband core up to
> date.
Well that was interesting.
- All the patches had mangled headers:
-- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1-16/...
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1-17/...
instead of
--- linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1-16/.
10 matches
Mail list logo
