Re: [PATCH 0/2] More RCU vs idle fixes

2020-11-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:18:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:47:27PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: > > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > > > > Both arm64 and s390 are tripping over arch_cpu_idle() RCU,tracing,lockdep > > > interaction. While looking at that I also found fai

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More RCU vs idle fixes

2020-11-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:47:27PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > > Both arm64 and s390 are tripping over arch_cpu_idle() RCU,tracing,lockdep > > interaction. While looking at that I also found fail in inte_idle. > > > > Please consider for this cycle. > > Is anyone tak

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More RCU vs idle fixes

2020-11-24 Thread Sven Schnelle
Peter Zijlstra writes: > Both arm64 and s390 are tripping over arch_cpu_idle() RCU,tracing,lockdep > interaction. While looking at that I also found fail in inte_idle. > > Please consider for this cycle. Is anyone taking this patchset? For s390, we also need to change the local_irq_safe/restore