On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:49:31PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Maneesh Soni wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:04:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:31:00PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>> sd->s_dentry updates made by dentry/inode reclamation are racy and can
> >>> lead to BU
Maneesh Soni wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:04:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:31:00PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> sd->s_dentry updates made by dentry/inode reclamation are racy and can
>>> lead to BUG() or oops. This is already fixed in -mm and the fix is
>>> schedul
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:04:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:31:00PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > sd->s_dentry updates made by dentry/inode reclamation are racy and can
> > lead to BUG() or oops. This is already fixed in -mm and the fix is
> > scheduled to be merged into up
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:31:00PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> sd->s_dentry updates made by dentry/inode reclamation are racy and can
> lead to BUG() or oops. This is already fixed in -mm and the fix is
> scheduled to be merged into upstream for 2.6.23 but the fix
> reimplements sysfs dentry droppin
4 matches
Mail list logo