Hello Minchan,
On (03/06/14 17:26), Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Sergey,
>
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:10:56PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > While fixing lockdep spew of ->init_lock reported by Sasha Levin [1],
> > Minchan
> > Kim noted [2] that it's better to move compression backend allo
Hello Sergey,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:10:56PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> While fixing lockdep spew of ->init_lock reported by Sasha Levin [1], Minchan
> Kim noted [2] that it's better to move compression backend allocation (using
> GPF_KERNEL) out of the ->init_lock lock, same way as wi
On (03/05/14 15:57), Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 03/04/2014 11:10 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > While fixing lockdep spew of ->init_lock reported by Sasha Levin [1],
> > Minchan
> > Kim noted [2] that it's better to move compression backend allocation (using
> > GPF_KERNEL) out of the ->init_l
On 03/04/2014 11:10 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> While fixing lockdep spew of ->init_lock reported by Sasha Levin [1], Minchan
> Kim noted [2] that it's better to move compression backend allocation (using
> GPF_KERNEL) out of the ->init_lock lock, same way as with zram_meta_alloc(),
> in order
4 matches
Mail list logo