On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 02:33:00PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:16:52PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:12:58AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> >The only remaining user of the radix tree in that tree is the IDR. So
>> >now I'm converting the IDR use
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:16:52PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:12:58AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >The only remaining user of the radix tree in that tree is the IDR. So
> >now I'm converting the IDR users over to the XArray as well.
>
> Wow, really a HUGE work.
Yes ..
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:12:58AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:47:44PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:51:29AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> >That is _fine_. As you know I hope to get rid of the radix tree soon ;-)
>>
>> You mean replace radix t
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:47:44PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:51:29AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >That is _fine_. As you know I hope to get rid of the radix tree soon ;-)
>
> You mean replace radix tree in whole kernel? That would be a big effort.
Already mostly done
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:51:29AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 06:29:58PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
>> I had my first go using the XArray today and during that I wondered if
>> it was safe to remove items during iteration. Conceptually it seems
>> fine and it seemed
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 06:29:58PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> The XArray is, in a way, a replacement data structure for linked lists,
> as such, on first use developers may wonder if it is safe to remove
> items while iterating over the array.
>
> For example, this is fine:
>
> DEFINE
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 06:29:58PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> I had my first go using the XArray today and during that I wondered if
> it was safe to remove items during iteration. Conceptually it seems
> fine and it seemed to work just fine in code - is this something people
> should not be
7 matches
Mail list logo