Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch to vga console only if framebuffer details are missing

2012-10-10 Thread Peter Jones
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 02:43:07PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 11:29 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > > From: Matt Fleming > > > > The efi_enabled variable has come to mean "Do we have EFI runtime > > services available?". However, lack of EFI runtime services does not > > mean

Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch to vga console only if framebuffer details are missing

2012-10-10 Thread Matt Fleming
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 11:29 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > From: Matt Fleming > > The efi_enabled variable has come to mean "Do we have EFI runtime > services available?". However, lack of EFI runtime services does not > mean that we should switch to using the VGA console. Provided that the > boot

Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch to vga console only if framebuffer details are missing

2012-09-17 Thread Matt Fleming
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 12:00 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:29:08 +0100 > Matt Fleming wrote: > > > From: Matt Fleming > > > > The efi_enabled variable has come to mean "Do we have EFI runtime > > services available?". However, lack of EFI runtime services does not > > mean that

Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch to vga console only if framebuffer details are missing

2012-09-17 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:29:08 +0100 Matt Fleming wrote: > From: Matt Fleming > > The efi_enabled variable has come to mean "Do we have EFI runtime > services available?". However, lack of EFI runtime services does not > mean that we should switch to using the VGA console. Provided that the > boo