Re: [PATCH] x86/tlb: Revert: Align TLB invalidation info

2019-04-16 Thread Nadav Amit
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:45:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> So very much Ack on that patch, but maybe we could do a bit more cleanup >> here? > > Yeah, Nadav was going to try and clean that up. But I figured we should > get this r

Re: [PATCH] x86/tlb: Revert: Align TLB invalidation info

2019-04-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:45:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So very much Ack on that patch, but maybe we could do a bit more cleanup here? Yeah, Nadav was going to try and clean that up. But I figured we should get this revert in and backported while it's hot :-)

Re: [PATCH] x86/tlb: Revert: Align TLB invalidation info

2019-04-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 1:03 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Using 320 bytes of stack space for a 40 byte structure is ludicrous and > clearly not right. Ack. That said, I wish we didn't have these stack structures at all. Or at least were more careful about them. For example, another case of this