Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL_DEFINE0

2018-03-19 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Michael, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4] [also build test ERROR on next-20180319] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tauts

Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL_DEFINE0

2018-03-19 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Michael, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4] [also build test ERROR on next-20180319] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tauts

Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL_DEFINE0

2018-03-14 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Tautschnig, Michael wrote: > > > All definitions of syscalls in x86 except for those patched here have > > already been using the appropriate SYSCALL_DEFINE*. > > Dominik, do you have more urgent stuff queued

Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL_DEFINE0

2018-03-14 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Tautschnig, Michael wrote: > All definitions of syscalls in x86 except for those patched here have > already been using the appropriate SYSCALL_DEFINE*. Dominik, do you have more urgent stuff queued in that area? If yes, please add: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner If not, I s