Re: [PATCH] x86/pti: Add pti= cmdline option and documentation

2017-12-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Will Deacon wrote: > But I would still like to avoid divergence on the name. Please rename it to 'PTI' to sync the naming with x86. Thanks, Ingo

Re: [PATCH] x86/pti: Add pti= cmdline option and documentation

2017-12-14 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:28:56PM +, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > From: Borislav Petkov > > > > Keep the "nopti" for traditional reasons. > > > > Requested-by: Linus Torvalds > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > > Cc: Linus Torv

Re: [PATCH] x86/pti: Add pti= cmdline option and documentation

2017-12-12 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Borislav, [+ tglx] On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov > > Keep the "nopti" for traditional reasons. > > Requested-by: Linus Torvalds > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > Cc: Linus Torvalds > Cc: Andy Lutomirsky > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > C

Re: [PATCH] x86/pti: Add pti= cmdline option and documentation

2017-12-12 Thread Juergen Gross
On 12/12/17 14:39, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov > > Keep the "nopti" for traditional reasons. > > Requested-by: Linus Torvalds > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Juergen